Re:Wikipedia survives while the rest of the internet breaks
by Kim_Bruning on Thursday September 04, 2025 @05:27PM
(#45132414)
If you encounter that, you can possibly get help to get those articles unstuck. People are not supposed to keep fiefdoms, much of policy prevents it. (and someone with a bit of practice can call in help and clear it up)
Re:Wikipedia survives while the rest of the internet breaks
by ozim on Thursday September 04, 2025 @06:17PM
(#45132868)
But to do that you have to stop being random and start playing Wikipedia game.
Random people don’t have time for that.
Ergo “it is not a project for random editors anymore”.
I want do an edit or addition and be fairly evaluated without having to call higher instances or fight through bureaucracy.
Re:Wikipedia survives while the rest of the internet breaks
by Kim_Bruning on Thursday September 04, 2025 @06:22PM
(#45132904)
Fair-ish. It really depends. The last few areas I did anything in (I'm not a regular anymore) basically nothing happened except what I wrote, so I guess the quiet parts are really really quiet and you don't get into much trouble at all.
The same applies on a larger scale with moderation. There are plenty of poorly-sourced database-like stub entries for STEM subjects, but try to make a page on a "softer" subject and there's a pretty good chance someone will try to nuke it with WP:PROOF, WP:NOTE, and/or WP:OBSCURE if it isn't perfectly fleshed out in the very first draft.