Google can keep its Chrome browser but will be barred from exclusive contracts

Re:Google can keep its Chrome browser but will be barred fro... by camillomiller on Wednesday September 03, 2025 @02:43AM (#45112898)

As a reporter, I can tell you that your comment stems from a common fallacy: y’all think you know better than reporters what our jobs are and what the dynamics of our publishing platform entail. For some reason, everyone feels like they would know how to be a journalist better than the actual professionals.

That said, reporters have most probably nothing to do with what you’re decrying. Linking policies are not the reporter’s business. There are probably multiple layers of SEO “experts” and upper management deciding what goes on page and what not. Funnily enough, they might be super anal about what the story links, and then let Taboola link the worst shit on the Internet under each piece… So please, when you start your sentence with “reporters” please know that you’re criticizing something they have no power to change.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google can keep its Chrome browser but will be barred fro... by mquander on Wednesday September 03, 2025 @03:03AM (#45113027)

I sympathize with how annoying it must be to have other people messing up your work, but also, if your name is at the top of the page, and there's not really any other way for readers to know anyone in particular that is taking responsibility for any specific detail on that page, it's obviously going to be your reputation on the line to some extent.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google can keep its Chrome browser but will be barred fro... by widhhddok on Wednesday September 03, 2025 @04:37AM (#45113510)

This comment deflects from the very real original comment's gripe with not linking to the original source.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google can keep its Chrome browser but will be barred fro... by inigoalonso on Wednesday September 03, 2025 @05:10AM (#45113716)

How is providing factual information (e.g., "The full court ruling is available at https://court.rulings/case_123456.pdf", or at least "The case is number 123456.") not part of the reporter's job? No need to link to it, just provide the fact.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google can keep its Chrome browser but will be barred fro... by frontfor on Wednesday September 03, 2025 @06:31AM (#45114166)

It doesn’t matter. From the general population point of view, whoever writes the article is the “reporter”, and “they” don’t provide the links. You can argue otherwise and it won’t change the optics.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google can keep its Chrome browser but will be barred fro... by supernova87a on Friday September 05, 2025 @03:04AM (#45135746)

I don't really care if you think people don't understand details of the job you do, or the system in which you operate. Your name is on the article and it's my expectation at this point that someone telling a story give me the original source when it's easily available. I don't need to know the complications or reasons why it isn't done, I want the right outcome.

If anything, you should be helping to cut through the BS layers and insisting that the original source link (or, even just the full name of the court case) be included with your reporting.

[ Parent | on HN ]