News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The future of 32-bit support in the kernel by pavon on Tuesday September 02, 2025 @12:41AM (#45099208)
There are a lot of computations where 256 is too small of a range but 65536 is overkill. When designers of early computers were working out how many digits of precision their calculations needed to have for their intended purpose 12 bits commonly ended up being a sweet spot.

When your RAM is vacuum tubes or magnetic core memory, you don't want 25% of it to go unused, just to round your word size up a power of two.

Re:The future of 32-bit support in the kernel by skeezyboy on Tuesday September 02, 2025 @11:44AM (#45104622)
> There are a lot of computations where 256 is too small of a range but 65536 is overkill

wasnt this more to do with cost? they could do arbitrary precision code even back then. its not like they were only calculating numbers less than 65537, ignoring anything larger