News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Grok Code Fast 1 by jameshart on Friday August 29, 2025 @03:36PM (#45068431)
Well, you’d also be forgiven for thinking ‘how on earth can a social website chatbot be a white supremacist?’ And yet xAI managed to prove that is a legitimate concern.

xAI has a shocking track record of poor decisions when it comes to training and prompting their AIs. If anyone can make a partisan coding assistant, they can. Indeed, given their leadership and past performance, we might expect them to explicitly try.

Re:Grok Code Fast 1 by simianwords on Friday August 29, 2025 @03:55PM (#45068655)
What’s their incentive to do this? What do they gain by making a partisan model instead of one that just works well?
Re:Grok Code Fast 1 by pennomi on Friday August 29, 2025 @04:39PM (#45069140)
You really can’t think of ANY advantage to becoming a perfected propaganda machine? Not one?
Re:Grok Code Fast 1 by simianwords on Friday August 29, 2025 @04:43PM (#45069175)
Enlighten me. How would a partisan coding model help.
Re:Grok Code Fast 1 by ben_w on Friday August 29, 2025 @06:24PM (#45070093)
Competence in every field is correlated for LLMs. Better coding probably means more competent rhetoric and more competent Swahili-Latin translation. But only "probably", the causation is being argued about.
Re:Grok Code Fast 1 by dudeinjapan on Friday August 29, 2025 @04:14PM (#45068892)
Perhaps you’ve never heard of Tay?

Microsoft did pioneering work in the Nazi chatbot space.

Re:Grok Code Fast 1 by arjvik on Friday August 29, 2025 @05:21PM (#45069529)
Fwiw Tay was unintentional and was shut down immediately upon realization… very good case study for safety folks!