By that logic AI already killing people. We can't presume that whatever can be found on the internet is reliable data, can't we?

If science taught us anything it's that no data is ever reliable. We are pretty sure about so many things, and it's the best available info so we might as well use it, but in terms of "the internet can be wrong" -> any source can be wrong! And I'd not even be surprised if internet in aggregate (with the bot reading all of it) is right more often than individual authors of pretty much anything

Yet we use it every day for police, military, and political targeting with economic and kinetic consequences.

Okay, let them

The current state of the art in AI poisoning is Nightshade from the University of Chicago. It's meant to eventually be an addon to their WebGlaze[1] which is an invite-only tool meant for artists to protect their art from AI mimicry

Nobody is dying because artists are protecting their art

[0] https://nightshade.cs.uchicago.edu/whatis.html

[1] https://glaze.cs.uchicago.edu/webglaze.html

You mean incompetent users of AI will get people killed. You don't get a free pass because you used a tool that sucked.

This is some next level blame shifting. Next you are going to steal motor oil and then complain that your customers got sick when you used it to cook their food.