Re:In Search of AI Psychosis
by mallowdram on Friday August 29, 2025 @01:11PM
(#45066739)
Both Churchland's are out of date. Note the references above, this is a neurobiological, dynamic approach they're not party to. If you don't know what those are or optic flow, neural reuse are, then study them. Trad Neuroscience and cog-sci is no longer applicable.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:In Search of AI Psychosis
by suddenlybananas on Friday August 29, 2025 @01:20PM
(#45066864)
God you are so smug about something you know essentially nothing about.
Re:In Search of AI Psychosis
by mallowdram on Friday August 29, 2025 @01:30PM
(#45066998)
I'm lead dev in a start-up that applies coordination dynamics to spatial-syntax. I probably know quite a bit more than you do about what I'm doing.
Re:In Search of AI Psychosis
by suddenlybananas on Friday August 29, 2025 @04:15PM
(#45068897)
I don't care what narrow thing you're working on, the brain is simply not as well understood as you think it is.
Re:In Search of AI Psychosis
by mallowdram on Friday August 29, 2025 @05:41PM
(#45069718)
We have a substantial grasp of the allocortex to make significant probes into working memory that relate to semantic memory, episodic thought, emotion and certain senses.
The very idea we understand that Sharp Wave Ripples encode this and that various scales of waves integrate to create memories and action is the beginning of bypassing existing computational frameworks.