If anything, the LLM crowd always sees themselves as messianic and victims.

The burden of proof is on the ones saying a new concept/tool (LLMs) is revolutionary. I provided studies showing not only the new concept is not revolutionary, but that it is a step back.

> Your argument seems to project significantly more certainty and spittle.

I am not surprised that a bunch of folks outsourcing their critical thinking to a fancy autocomplete don't have any arguments nor studies though. Spittle? Please, at least there is an argument and links.

From the LLM cult crowd there is usually nothing, just crickets. Show me the studies, show me the links, show me proof that LLMs are the revolution you so desperately want it to be. Until then, I got the receipts that, if anything, LLMs are just another tool.