Re:Neuralink 'Participant 1' Noland Arbaugh says his whole l...
by peterfirefly on Thursday August 28, 2025 @02:52AM
(#45049218)
Ostensibly for the benefit of a man who had 9 shares. And then that man's lawyers demanded billions from Tesla for their trouble.
Same judge who forced him to overpay for Twitter.
I was one of those shareholders who voted FOR that pay package with power of six figures worth of stock. He didn't "sue the shareholders"
Shareholders are strongly on Elon's side here, as they have always have been. The only reason there is a lawsuit is because some bent judge is trying to take the shareholder's power away from them and not grant the pay package. Absolute corruption.