Your post is full of shallow, unconvincing dismissals, mostly just you claiming stuff that isn't true, or essentially saying "nuh uh!” So, if you reply here, please make sure you back up your claims with reliable sources.

> it's not whatabouatism

It is common for someone engaging in whataboutism to unconvincingly deny it. Unfortunately, your whataboutism is whataboutism. If you want to avoid accusations of whataboutism, don't engage in it. That means not saying stuff like 'but what about Y' when defending X.

> and what makes you think that journalist organization promote truth

What makes you think israel does? They're certainly less reliable than the average journalist, given that israel in particular is globally notorious for lying, for attacking investigators, journalists, and other innocent civilians, and as we both noted in our posts, for 40+ years of violent, racist terrorist attacks against innocent Palestinian civilians.

> the only problem is that PA authorities are interfering with it.

You seem to be confused—israel is the one perpetrating the most journalist killing lately (the most in Palestine? No, the most in the entire world), and they forbid and prevent most journalists from entering or reporting from both the Gaza areas of Palestine and the West Bank areas of Palestine.

> israel doesn't have to provide justification to you or anybody else

Turns out, they do. The unsubstantiated claims of the attacker are pretty much always insufficient justification for an attack, but in particular here, because israel in particular is globally notorious for lying, for attacking investigators, journalists, and other innocent civilians, and as we both noted in our posts, for 40+ years of violent, racist, israeli terrorist attacks against innocent Palestinian civilians.