Re:RFK Jr demanded a vaccine study be retracted – the journa...
by keepgettingban on Saturday August 23, 2025 @11:53PM
(#45001229)
I think maybe you've missed my point. I'm not sure if you read my initial question (flagged into hidden now), but I was trying to discuss blind faith in big pharma.
Re:RFK Jr demanded a vaccine study be retracted – the journa...
by wat10000 on Sunday August 24, 2025 @12:48AM
(#45001486)
Unlikely. Nobody has blind faith in big pharma so what’s the point in trying to discuss it?
Re:RFK Jr demanded a vaccine study be retracted – the journa...
by defrost on Sunday August 24, 2025 @01:06AM
(#45001547)
You can link to your initial question if you wish (one of the other green accounts?)
I don't have blind faith in big pharma, I don't know anyone who does.
I do trust the epidemiologists I've personally met and worked with, I do see the many separate and independent studies across multiple countries that all conclude mRNA myocardial risk is real but minor, not deadly if addressed, and associated with one class of mRNA vaccine (not all), and conclude that vaccine risk is less than no vaccine risk.
Given Australia ceased using the specific mRNA vaccine that demonstrated a correlation with a very slight increase in hospitalization is moot in any case.
None the less:
~ https://ncirs.org.au/ncirs-study-assesses-clinical-progressi...From Australia, a country of ~ 25 million where ~ 98% of the population were triple vaccinated for COVID with pre-existing comprehensive population wide medical records going back to at least the 1970s.
Despite the "flood" of vaccine there was no significant increase of myocarditis in the population before | after mass vaccination.
A genuine desire to understand reality would lead you to examine this incongruence.