News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Go is still not good by jonathan920 on Friday August 22, 2025 @07:48AM (#44983353)
Oh no , Rust is too tough, go is no good, am i going back to java?
Re:Go is still not good by maxloh on Friday August 22, 2025 @07:59AM (#44983453)
Maybe the new in-development Carbon language? It sounds promising, but it is nowhere near its 1.0 release.
Re:Go is still not good by masklinn on Friday August 22, 2025 @08:16AM (#44983584)
Carbon exists only for interoperating with and transitioning off of C++. Creating a new code base in carbon doesn’t really make sense, and the project’s readme literally tells you not to do that.
Re:Go is still not good by maxloh on Friday August 22, 2025 @08:35AM (#44983794)
> ... and the project’s readme literally tells you not to do that.

Could you quote which paragraph you're talking about?

AFAIK, interoperability with C++ code is just one of their explicit goals; they only place that as the last item in the "Language Goals" section.

Re:Go is still not good by masklinn on Friday August 22, 2025 @09:26AM (#44984407)
> Existing modern languages already provide an excellent developer experience: Go, Swift, Kotlin, Rust, and many more. Developers that can use one of these existing languages should.
Re:Go is still not good by pjmlp on Friday August 22, 2025 @08:27AM (#44983692)
So many options in-between.