Re:Sequoia Backs Zed's Vision for Collaborative Coding
by jonas21 on Thursday August 21, 2025 @12:04AM
(#44968928)
I think it's less that they sat on their laurels and more that a team of 2 had trouble keeping up with the dozens of well-paid folks working on VSCode. Which suggests that perhaps a shareware model did not work out so well for them.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Sequoia Backs Zed's Vision for Collaborative Coding
by shawabawa3 on Thursday August 21, 2025 @02:14AM
(#44969585)
They literally stopped developing for about 5 years, it wasn't just about the team not keeping up
Re:Sequoia Backs Zed's Vision for Collaborative Coding
by Ygg2 on Thursday August 21, 2025 @03:50AM
(#44970221)
Why would you stop developing for 5 years?
Re:Sequoia Backs Zed's Vision for Collaborative Coding
by jon-wood on Thursday August 21, 2025 @05:29AM
(#44970741)
Maybe they just wanted to do something else. Sometimes people just don't want to grind on endlessly for theoretically more money when what they've got already is enough for them.
Re:Sequoia Backs Zed's Vision for Collaborative Coding
by WD-42 on Thursday August 21, 2025 @11:52AM
(#44974309)
Probably to write sublime merge
Re:Sequoia Backs Zed's Vision for Collaborative Coding
by ben-schaaf on Thursday August 21, 2025 @11:06AM
(#44973716)
I don't think development actually stopped. ST3 was in a quiet public beta for a long time, but you can see builds of ST3 from 2013 to 2019: https://www.sublimetext.com/3.