Re:Court decides "Pay or Okay" on DerStandard.at is illegal
by juliangmp on Tuesday August 19, 2025 @02:25AM
(#44948802)
This!
What benefit does any of this current system provide us anyway?
Re:Court decides "Pay or Okay" on DerStandard.at is illegal
by Dilettante_ on Tuesday August 19, 2025 @04:23AM
(#44949473)
Devil's Advocate? It pays for the services we use for free.
Re:Court decides "Pay or Okay" on DerStandard.at is illegal
by Ukv on Tuesday August 19, 2025 @06:29AM
(#44950078)
I feel that's only really true in the way it is of a JS bitcoin miner. Locally appears to make something free (if discounting time/energy) that wasn't before, but is overall a detriment to average affordability because it's a net loss of resources (mostly just a zero-sum game, with some small side benefits).
Re:Court decides "Pay or Okay" on DerStandard.at is illegal
by Dilettante_ on Tuesday August 19, 2025 @01:35PM
(#44954092)
I don't disagree with that at all, and by 'free' I suppose I didn't even mean 'as in free beer', I just meant there was no financial transaction taking place.
Maybe at some point we're really gonna see an upfront-micropayment structure as some people have mused about.
People should not have an option to accept "being spied at all times on their personal behavior". It is creepy, it is dangerous and it is inhuman.
The exceptions should be the ones that currently already exist in GDPR. Financial institutions can use data to track fraud, law enforcement can use data from ongoing criminal cases, etc.
To have an option "to be spied" is a dystopian result of the lawlessness and bad faith on the Internet.