I hear you are invested in this line of thought, and that is okay. I just don’t agree with the analysis, and not with the labeling.
Re:IQ Tests Results for AI
by breakyerself on Sunday August 17, 2025 @04:01PM
(#44934465)
It doesn't rely on work by Eugenicists?
Fortunately, science does not rely on the character of its purveyors but on the quality of the evidence.
Re:IQ Tests Results for AI
by breakyerself on Monday August 18, 2025 @10:00PM
(#44947485)
The quality of the evidence wasn't any better than the character of the purveyors. You're an apologist for bullshit.
Re:IQ Tests Results for AI
by machomaster on Sunday August 17, 2025 @07:02PM
(#44935706)
Calling something "controversial" is a total non-argument. The book's science about IQ is solid.
In actuality, the content of the book was simply a collection of mainstream scientific consensus ideas at that time, without specific controversial add-ons. It's only after the book was published, the book unexpectedly was attacked by proto-woke people.
Re:IQ Tests Results for AI
by breakyerself on Monday August 18, 2025 @10:02PM
(#44947494)
Yeah Nazi aligned eugenicist science is totally mainstream.
Re:IQ Tests Results for AI
by machomaster on Wednesday August 20, 2025 @03:38PM
(#44965531)
Inventing strawman out of thin air in order to drown discussion, to attack individuals and paint them evil, that's literally what Nazis did. How ironic.
https://youtu.be/UBc7qBS1Ujo?si=bzVMwGU4XjPrk4sr