Re:Dicing an Onion, the Mathematically Optimal Way
by hashmap on Saturday August 16, 2025 @12:10PM
(#44924667)
I dislike easily 90%+ of the images I recognize as AI-generated, but the ones on this internet web site I think are a good use of the tech.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Dicing an Onion, the Mathematically Optimal Way
by russsamora on Saturday August 16, 2025 @12:53PM
(#44925073)
There was no AI used on this website!
Re:Dicing an Onion, the Mathematically Optimal Way
by ctenb on Saturday August 16, 2025 @03:31PM
(#44926284)
Source?
Re:Dicing an Onion, the Mathematically Optimal Way
by masfuerte on Saturday August 16, 2025 @03:34PM
(#44926298)
He's one of the three named authors on the article. I'd be interested to know how the onion text was made.
Re:Dicing an Onion, the Mathematically Optimal Way
by re on Saturday August 16, 2025 @03:59PM
(#44926467)
Looks like the font predates this article:
Re:Dicing an Onion, the Mathematically Optimal Way
by bowsamic on Sunday August 17, 2025 @01:13AM
(#44929051)
The M in that font is not really suitable for professional use
Re:Dicing an Onion, the Mathematically Optimal Way
by ziml77 on Sunday August 17, 2025 @03:03PM
(#44934006)
I thought you must be exaggerating, but then I looked... And yeah, that M needs some work to make it not look like a woman bending over.
Re:Dicing an Onion, the Mathematically Optimal Way
by hashmap on Monday August 18, 2025 @12:23PM
(#44942380)
Well, so much for that sentiment! Those onion letters definitely struck me as the original "look we can make chairs out of avocados" use case for dall-e. I guess it's not surprising that good looking AI images turn out to not be AI images in the first place.