Re:People Chose Bing Over Google Nearly 2:1 in Blind Compari...
by ghshephard on Friday September 07, 2012 @11:17PM
(#4492120)
As interesting as this may seem - take it with a grain of salt. One very effective way of biasing these surveys are to run them a number of times - if there is any significant variance in the results - you can always ignore the studies that didn't work out well, and publicize the one that does.
Far better for a third-party to commission these studies and do them once, and see what the results are.
Re:People Chose Bing Over Google Nearly 2:1 in Blind Compari...
by lukevdp on Saturday September 08, 2012 @12:59AM
(#4492297)
yes, I would love to see third party replication for this result.
Another thing to keep in mind with this study is it tests users in an abstracted environment. E.g., things you might find useful when comparing two sets of ten results may not be the things you find useful when you're looking for a hotel in new york.
Re:People Chose Bing Over Google Nearly 2:1 in Blind Compari...
by taligent on Saturday September 08, 2012 @02:28AM
(#4492442)
Actually this wouldn't surprise me for some searches. When searching for say "new york hotels" I often find Google's attempts at "trying to help" to be annoying.
I don't want to see the main search results dedicated to showing an arbitrary selection of local new york hotels. I just want the links to sites like Expedia etc who will show me ALL the hotels.
Far better for a third-party to commission these studies and do them once, and see what the results are.
Another thing to keep in mind with this study is it tests users in an abstracted environment. E.g., things you might find useful when comparing two sets of ten results may not be the things you find useful when you're looking for a hotel in new york.
I don't want to see the main search results dedicated to showing an arbitrary selection of local new york hotels. I just want the links to sites like Expedia etc who will show me ALL the hotels.