https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgkfIQ4IGaM
That's not a mirage, it's clearly capability that a smaller model cannot demonstrate. A model with less parameters and less hidden layers cannot have a neuron that lights up when it detects a face.
As the number of neurons increases, the best face/non-face distinguisher neuron gets better and better, but there's never a size where the model cannot recognize faces at all and then you add just a single neuron that recognizes them perfectly.
True
> then you add just a single neuron that recognizes them perfectly
Not true.
Don't think in terms of neurons, think in terms of features. A feature can be spread out over multiple neurons (polysemanticity), I just use a single neuron as a simplified example. But if those multiple neurons perfectly describe the feature, then all of them are important to describe the feature.
The Universal Approximation Theorem implies that a large enough network to perfectly achieve that goal would exist (let's call it size n or larger), so eventually you'd get what you want between 0 and n neurons.
You could remove any one of those neurons before retraining the model from scratch and polysemanticity would slightly increase while perfomance slightly decreases, but really only slightly. There are no hard size thresholds, just a spectrum of more or less accurate approximations.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.15004
Good article about why here; this helped me understand a lot:
https://www.wired.com/story/how-quickly-do-large-language-mo...