News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Statement Regarding Misleading Media Reports by rglover on Thursday August 14, 2025 @02:44PM (#44904080)
I don't doubt that, but most consumers are not professional photographers. They want results that look professional.

A digital camera is a no-brainer combined with a printing station where the phone just docks. They already have a version of this, but if they control hardware they could make it really solid—no compatibility issues, no headaches, just exactly what you want: an easy way to capture high-quality memories that don't get lost in the void of your camera roll.

Re:Statement Regarding Misleading Media Reports by jfim on Thursday August 14, 2025 @02:50PM (#44904142)
Phones already do a lot of processing of images to make them look better than what a digital camera would capture out of the box, and Kodak already makes such a dock, it's called the Kodak dock: https://www.kodak.com/en/consumer/product/printing-scanning/...
Re:Statement Regarding Misleading Media Reports by rekabis on Thursday August 14, 2025 @03:20PM (#44904480)
$200CAD. Ouch.

A little cheaper than an Epson EcoTank printer, for sure (about ⅔ the price), and likely much better prints. But it’s a single-purpose machine, not something that can print off _anything_ in colour on Letter/A4 sized paper.

Re:Statement Regarding Misleading Media Reports by dingaling on Friday August 15, 2025 @01:15AM (#44908844)
> A digital camera is a no-brainer

A digital camera might be straightforward but the magic is in the lenses. You could make the most fabulous CMOS sensor known to man but if you put it behind a 3mm-thick, hugely aspheric plastic lens like a phone uses then you might as well not have bothered.