Re:Nearly 1 in 3 Starlink satellites detected within the SKA...
by lazide on Wednesday August 13, 2025 @01:32PM
(#44891322)
The take away is they weren’t big enough to have enough leverage eh?
Re:Nearly 1 in 3 Starlink satellites detected within the SKA...
by rickdeckard on Wednesday August 13, 2025 @02:04PM
(#44891749)
> The take away is they weren’t big enough to have enough leverage eh?
This reasoning has some parallels to "everything that can't be explained by science must be god". It stays valid even when proven wrong...
Re:Nearly 1 in 3 Starlink satellites detected within the SKA...
by lazide on Wednesday August 13, 2025 @03:25PM
(#44892693)
Eh, if they died and everything didn’t actually break in a terrible unsolvable way, then….
It’s essentially a form of market extortion though, so perception of ‘survivable’ matters as much as actually survivable eh?
Enron, Arthur Andersen, WorldCom comes to mind. Even Blockbuster could be on that list...