News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The "high-level CPU" challenge (2008) by Dylan16807 on Tuesday August 12, 2025 @04:18PM (#44881321)
That sounds like an FPGA, but aren't those notoriously slow for most uses? You can make a kickass signal pipeline or maybe an emulator but most code gets shunted to an attached arm core or even a soft-core implemented on top that wastes an order of magnitude of performance.

And no architecture is clock limited by driving signals across the die. Why do people keep assuming this? CPU designers are very smart and they break slow things into multiple steps.

Re:The "high-level CPU" challenge (2008) by bigfishrunning on Tuesday August 12, 2025 @04:49PM (#44881668)
> That sounds like an FPGA, but aren't those notoriously slow for most uses?

If you're trying to run software on them yes. If you use them for their stated purpose (as an array of gates), then they can be orders of magnitude faster then the equivalent computer program. It's all about using the right tool for the right job.