Re:Where were you when goo.gl shutdown?
by const_cast on Tuesday August 12, 2025 @04:00PM
(#44881171)
I think more important than URL shorteners is URL structure. It should work like a directory, where you can intuitively guess what subdirectories there are.
This NYT link is actually pretty good. year/month/day/category/title is pretty nice. The query parameter ruins it, but that's kind of unavoidable if you want a reproducible link with extra data. Usually you can omit query parameters and the URL should still work.
Re:Where were you when goo.gl shutdown?
by moolcool on Wednesday August 13, 2025 @07:56AM
(#44887353)
That matters too, but those solve different problems.
Not saying you're wrong, just wondering if it was an option to take a picture of the screen using your phone. In my experience, that's how students tend to capture such info when it isn't provided to them electronically.
Re:Where were you when goo.gl shutdown?
by bigstrat2003 on Tuesday August 12, 2025 @02:26PM
(#44880067)
"Rare" doesn't mean "non-existent". Some people (such as yourself) might indeed need to type links in manually on a regular basis, but for most people it is quite rare.
It's absolutely not rare. I can't tell you how many times I sat in the back of a classroom, squinting at a whiteboard, trying to type copy a URL that looked like this: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/12/technology/silicon-chips-...