Re:Texas politicians warn Smithsonian it must not lobby to r...
by AlotOfReading on Friday August 08, 2025 @07:47PM
(#44842855)
Not defending this specific case, but is it really unprecedented to remove an item from the Smithsonian and send it somewhere else? There's been a similar order for them to return cultural remains to their owners since 1989.
Re:Texas politicians warn Smithsonian it must not lobby to r...
by Animats on Saturday August 09, 2025 @12:38AM
(#44844067)
NASA at least gets to pick which shuttle, if they have to go through with this. Enterprise, which is stored in a tent near the Intrepid aircraft carrier in New York, might be an option. There's no historical relationship between Intrepid and the Space Shuttle. Enterprise was placed where it is now by lifting it from a barge with a large crane. So it could be put onto a barge again and moved to Houston by water.[1]
[1] https://intrepidmuseum.org/exhibitions/permanent-exhibitions...
There's nothing about noting that something is "unprecedented" that counts as lobbying or opposition per se. It could be "unprecedented" in a good way; the organization might have also just been answering a question or asking for clarification -- which seems reasonable given that the law specifies something involved in the Commercial Crew Program, not the shuttle.