News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We replaced passwords with something worse by pandorobo on Wednesday August 06, 2025 @11:50PM (#44820400)
Thats simple a lie or you didn't read the article.

The very first bullet point states: Enter an email address or phone number

That insinuates email OR SMS.

It doesn't just mention email only.

Re:We replaced passwords with something worse by max__dev on Wednesday August 06, 2025 @11:54PM (#44820425)
The following is copied from wikipedia.

The authentication factors of a multi-factor authentication scheme may include: 1. Something the user has: Any physical object in the possession of the user, such as a security token (USB stick), a bank card, a key, a phone that can be reached at a certain number, etc. 2. Something the user knows: Certain knowledge only known to the user, such as a password, PIN, PUK, etc. 3. Something the user is: Some physical characteristic of the user (biometrics), such as a fingerprint, eye iris, voice, typing speed, pattern in key press intervals, etc.

Email and phone are both in category one, comprising only one unique factor.

Re:We replaced passwords with something worse by sophiebits on Wednesday August 06, 2025 @11:51PM (#44820406)
Half factor authentication, then, since either one will work.
Re:We replaced passwords with something worse by stavros on Thursday August 07, 2025 @03:13AM (#44821498)
It's still a single factor.
Re:We replaced passwords with something worse by anonymars on Thursday August 07, 2025 @10:13AM (#44824707)
What is the minimum number of things you need access to in order to log in?

If you have access to the phone, you can log in. OR if you have access to the email account, you can log in.

You don't need to know the user's password, you only need access to one of these inboxes and nothing else. One-factor authentication, but worse, because there are multiple attack surfaces.