News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Grok generates fake Taylor Swift nudes without being asked. Parent comment

Re:Grok generates fake Taylor Swift nudes without being asked by Joker_vD on Wednesday August 06, 2025 @09:49AM (#44812015)
Okay, this question probably should be asked from a throwaway, but I'll bite: do you consider imagining some person, without the consent of that person, engaging in a sexual act, to be immoral? Putting this imagination of yours onto a paper, in the form of words or drawing?

Or is the problem here is the fact that such imagining was "commissioned" to a third party (I believe I have seen this opinion somewhere long time ago)?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Grok generates fake Taylor Swift nudes without being asked by JohnFen on Wednesday August 06, 2025 @09:54AM (#44812082)
> do you consider imagining some person, without the consent of that person, engaging in a sexual act, to be immoral?

Of course not. But that's a universe apart from producing and distributing sexual images of unconsenting others.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Grok generates fake Taylor Swift nudes without being asked by ttemPumpinRary on Friday August 08, 2025 @12:40PM (#44839025)
Is it though, if your neural link uploads your subconscious into the cloud for safety ?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Grok generates fake Taylor Swift nudes without being asked by npteljes on Wednesday August 06, 2025 @02:29PM (#44815782)
Yes, third party automated "imagining" is the problem:

https://www.citizen.org/news/two-thirds-of-states-enact-bill...

[ Parent | on HN ]