News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Grunt.js by richo on Wednesday September 05, 2012 @09:23AM (#4479203)
I don't get it.. are you posting this as news?

I'm pretty sure it's common knowledge, I'm one of those annoying node haters and I've known about it for months now.

Re:Grunt.js by cleverjake on Wednesday September 05, 2012 @09:49AM (#4479315)
Sorry.

This was posted for two reasons.

1 - I don't believe it is common knowledge. A lot of people know about it, but it is not quite reached the mainstream.

2 - They launched a new website.

Re:Grunt.js by mwill on Wednesday September 05, 2012 @11:59AM (#4479929)
Big node fan, hadn't seen this either. Side note, not criticising parent comment specifically, just thinking out loud: I still don't get why people question relevancy of submissions on sites like HN. Surely if its getting upvoted enough to hit the front page, the community finds value in it, right?
Re:Grunt.js by pooriaazimi on Wednesday September 05, 2012 @10:11AM (#4479422)
I didn't know about it. I'm sure I had never read about it anywhere, even on HN.
Re:Grunt.js by sp4rki on Wednesday September 05, 2012 @11:08AM (#4479684)
Not useful or common knowledge to you doesn't mean it's not useful or new for others. If you knew about it, and dislike it, what are you doing commenting here? If I had the same opinion I would have shrugged and told myself "Oh... grunt... again... Move along", not come in here to make a completely useless remark, which by the way obviously does not align with what the majority here thinks.
Re:Grunt.js by richo on Thursday September 06, 2012 @11:20AM (#4484493)
It was intended as a legit question. With such a descriptive title as "Grunt.js" on the submission.. it was kinda hard to tell.

Had it been "Grunt.js has a new website" I would have kept my fat mouth shut.

Re:Grunt.js by cyborg on Wednesday September 05, 2012 @10:44AM (#4479578)
I'm an avid noder - and this is not common knowledge for me - but in fact great news!