Re:Candidates say they'd rather risk staying unemployed than...
by LtWorf on Monday August 04, 2025 @10:28AM
(#44786299)
It's funny that you think they can't just raise the prices at will. (And by funny i mean really sad)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Candidates say they'd rather risk staying unemployed than...
by whynotminot on Monday August 04, 2025 @01:26PM
(#44788896)
Do you think it’s a monopoly? Is it not a competitive market? I see many strong Western competitors along with an expanding array of high quality open source options out of China.
Re:Candidates say they'd rather risk staying unemployed than...
by LtWorf on Wednesday August 06, 2025 @05:48PM
(#44818252)
But the open source options out of china are forbidden because being spied by china is evil while being spied by USA is good… usual free market lovers dropping it whenever.
Re:Candidates say they'd rather risk staying unemployed than...
by whynotminot on Wednesday August 06, 2025 @07:50PM
(#44819196)
Forbidden by who? I can select Kimi as my model in Cursor right now at my American company. What are you even talking about
Re:Candidates say they'd rather risk staying unemployed than...
by whynotminot on Thursday August 07, 2025 @01:10AM
(#44820805)
Err so the American DoD — generally always concerned about supply chain considerations — prefers American models? And that’s surprising or problematic to you?
This is a weird conversation. At first you were concerned about prices and now you’re railing about the US Navy not using Chinese models. What’s your problem here?
Re:Candidates say they'd rather risk staying unemployed than...
by LtWorf on Thursday August 07, 2025 @04:05AM
(#44821860)
And you think it won't expand? Why?
Re:Candidates say they'd rather risk staying unemployed than...
by whynotminot on Thursday August 07, 2025 @11:18AM
(#44825624)
Expand to what? The US Army?