News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tesla must pay $329M in damages in fatal Autopilot case, ... by metabagel on Friday August 01, 2025 @03:38PM (#44761421)
What matters is the definition which most people use.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44761341

Re:Tesla must pay $329M in damages in fatal Autopilot case, ... by bangaladore on Friday August 01, 2025 @03:45PM (#44761512)
I guess I don't understand how.

> A navigation mechanism, as on an aircraft, that automatically maintains a preset course.

Applies here. As far as I can tell the system did do exactly that. But the details of the actual event are unclear (I've heard parked car but also just hitting the back of another car?)

Re:Tesla must pay $329M in damages in fatal Autopilot case, ... by metabagel on Friday August 01, 2025 @03:49PM (#44761573)
It’s an emergent technology. The onus is on Tesla to be crystal clear about capabilities, and consistently so. People might quite reasonably infer that something which is labeled as “auto-“ or “automatic” doesn’t require supervision.
Re:Tesla must pay $329M in damages in fatal Autopilot case, ... by scbrg on Friday August 01, 2025 @04:31PM (#44762138)
Such as automobile?
Re:Tesla must pay $329M in damages in fatal Autopilot case, ... by metabagel on Friday August 01, 2025 @04:35PM (#44762181)
Automobiles are self-propelled, not self-navigating. They don't rely on horses to pull them.

automobile: self-propelled (self moving)

autopilot: self-piloting (self navigating)

https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=automobile

Re:Tesla must pay $329M in damages in fatal Autopilot case, ... by philistine on Friday August 01, 2025 @06:23PM (#44763121)
Indeed, since you do not need to externally supervise the drivetrain in a car.
Re:Tesla must pay $329M in damages in fatal Autopilot case, ... by samrus on Saturday August 02, 2025 @07:06AM (#44766602)
It didnt maintain the course. It kept going at a t intersection and ploughed into another car