Re:Tesla must pay $329M in damages in fatal Autopilot case, ...
by metabagel on Friday August 01, 2025 @03:49PM
(#44761573)
It’s an emergent technology. The onus is on Tesla to be crystal clear about capabilities, and consistently so. People might quite reasonably infer that something which is labeled as “auto-“ or “automatic” doesn’t require supervision.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tesla must pay $329M in damages in fatal Autopilot case, ...
by scbrg on Friday August 01, 2025 @04:31PM
(#44762138)
Such as automobile?
Re:Tesla must pay $329M in damages in fatal Autopilot case, ...
by metabagel on Friday August 01, 2025 @04:35PM
(#44762181)
Automobiles are self-propelled, not self-navigating. They don't rely on horses to pull them.
automobile: self-propelled (self moving)
autopilot: self-piloting (self navigating)
Re:Tesla must pay $329M in damages in fatal Autopilot case, ...
by philistine on Friday August 01, 2025 @06:23PM
(#44763121)
Indeed, since you do not need to externally supervise the drivetrain in a car.