I've been looking for platforms where one can maybe more formally encode their thoughts, so that the argumentation and debating skill barrier is lowered / eliminated, along with manipulation. And I did find some, but they don't quite hit the spot, and even if they did, people aren't really on them, so it doesn't matter sadly.
P.S. "please do flag and downvote rather."
I don't have that capability, else I would certainly use it.
"Surely you can appreciate that their comment was not written in agreement with or support for you"
No, I disagree; I think that is exactly what it was--the subject of the comment was your comment, not mine--you wrote of my statement as being a universal truth, not v.v.
Unsurprisingly, on every point where you and I disagree, I think that I am right and you are wrong.
I think it is best that, from now on, neither of us speak to or about each other.
Edit:
> No, I disagree;
Sure, costs me nothing to take your word for it. Definitely came across like that to me though, so if that was not intentional, maybe it's something for your later consideration.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44728708
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44722043
It's laudable to want work like Pony to get discussed in terms of the most interesting things about it, but the best way to do this is to describe and explain more of what's interesting. It's not helpful to comment about how bad other comments are, and certainly not to cross into attack. Those things feed flamewars, as unfortunately happened badly in this thread. That's what we're most trying to avoid.
As for Pony, I'm not here to defend it or explain it ... I simply responded to casual dismissals of it on trivial grounds.
> I can't flag that outrageous personal attack and no one else has.
Why wouldn't you be able to flag it? And there's no flagged counter, it's not possible for ordinary users to tell how many times a post has been flagged or not.
I think there is a fundamental gap in communication. Your actual point is not coming across at all, anywhere in this thread.
That's why you're getting downvoted.
"For Pony in particular, the syntax is not important ... it's simply not the point of the language."
You said that in direct response to someone who was wanting to see the syntax. While I do appreciate that it's not strictly speaking necessary in the context of your reply, it doesn't communicate at all why syntax isn't important to the pony language. You're just making a definitive statement unsupported by anything. Context or even a brief explanation would have been extremely helpful and almost certainly avoided all of this fuss. Your response, given without any context as to why syntax isn't important for pony, was actually harmful, rather than useful.