News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Claude Code weekly rate limits by KaiserPro on Monday July 28, 2025 @03:45PM (#44714741)
To lay the cables required a huge amount of capital, to make that feasible its required financial engineering. That translates to high operating expenses.
Re:Claude Code weekly rate limits by AlotOfReading on Monday July 28, 2025 @03:49PM (#44714776)
SMS was originally piggybacking off unused bytes in packets already being sent to the tower, which was being paid for by existing phone bills. The only significant expenses involved transiting between networks. That was a separate surcharge in the early days.
Re:Claude Code weekly rate limits by ssk42 on Monday July 28, 2025 @04:16PM (#44715074)
Used to be? What changed?
Re:Claude Code weekly rate limits by daveguy on Monday July 28, 2025 @04:26PM (#44715191)
People started sending a lot more texts and making a lot fewer phone calls. And you can only piggyback so many text messages on the call packets.
Re:Claude Code weekly rate limits by KaiserPro on Tuesday July 29, 2025 @01:03PM (#44725789)
We don't use 2g GSM anymore.
Re:Claude Code weekly rate limits by KaiserPro on Tuesday July 29, 2025 @01:02PM (#44725783)
> SMS was originally piggybacking off unused bytes in packets already being sent to the tower

for GSM? not really, Yes SMS was sent at a lower priority than voice, so if there is a lot of voice traffic, SMSs wouldn't be delivered as quickly.

But, to my original point, do you think the towers were free?

Thats the point, it took a shittone of captial to make the network.

Did the mobile networks make a lot of cash? also yes. But they also took on huge amounts of debt and went bust.