News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Katharine Graham: The Washington Post by tptacek on Sunday July 27, 2025 @02:56PM (#44703626)
She met Buffett herself, saw his genius, and made him her professor. He’d bring 20 annual reports to board meetings, teaching her line by line.

Yeah, uh, that's not all she did. She and Buffett apparently had a long-running (and public) affair, which in part led to Susan Buffett separating from him and moving to San Francisco.

Re:Katharine Graham: The Washington Post by mosferatu on Sunday July 27, 2025 @03:32PM (#44703913)
They leave things like these out to engage people like you, it’s a discussion generator.
Re:Katharine Graham: The Washington Post by wds on Sunday July 27, 2025 @05:31PM (#44704885)
What level of privilege do I have to reach to have falsehoods be labeled 'discussion generators'?
Re:Katharine Graham: The Washington Post by tptacek on Sunday July 27, 2025 @05:58PM (#44705097)
Which falsehood are you referring to?
Re:Katharine Graham: The Washington Post by hn_throwaway_99 on Sunday July 27, 2025 @06:40PM (#44705384)
It may be perhaps splitting hairs, but this definitely seems like a case of "lying by omission" to me.

"She met Buffett herself, saw his genius, and made him her professor." would give any normal person reading this a completely false understanding of what actually happened.

Re:Katharine Graham: The Washington Post by tptacek on Sunday July 27, 2025 @08:23PM (#44705973)
I just couldn't tell if there was a dispute about Graham and Buffett's affair. The stuff I read was pretty specific; like, she'd toss him her house keys when he arrived at parties.
Re:Katharine Graham: The Washington Post by tough on Sunday July 27, 2025 @05:37PM (#44704927)
I was wondering how one "made Buffett her professor" without him wanting to teach in the first place

but that solves it

Re:Katharine Graham: The Washington Post by tucnak on Sunday July 27, 2025 @05:59PM (#44705106)
Why is this down-voted?
[dead]
Re:Katharine Graham: The Washington Post by ancillary on Sunday July 27, 2025 @08:46PM (#44706089)
Here's what looks like a reliable source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/style/2008/09/29/what...
Re:Katharine Graham: The Washington Post by tptacek on Sunday July 27, 2025 @09:13PM (#44706253)
Leaving aside the fact that I'm right, would you like a short treatise on why it couldn't be, even if I was wrong, starting with the evidentiary standards required to defame a public figure?
Re:Katharine Graham: The Washington Post by avs733 on Sunday July 27, 2025 @08:53PM (#44706120)
I mean it’s pretty widely reported using euphemisms of the time. This includes by the Washington post…

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/style/2008/09/29/what...

Re:Katharine Graham: The Washington Post by tjwebbnorfolk on Sunday July 27, 2025 @10:55PM (#44706785)
That's not all she did, but it's true that she needed a crash course in business, and learned quickly. She inherited the Post, she did not build it.
Re:Katharine Graham: The Washington Post by SilverElfin on Sunday July 27, 2025 @11:39PM (#44707010)
Between this and the brutalization of railway workers, I have a more negative view of Buffett personally. But somehow he has a very positive reputation. Why is that?
Re:Katharine Graham: The Washington Post by PieTime on Monday July 28, 2025 @01:42AM (#44707552)
Money, also they fake I drink X coke a day while knowing he can pay for any medication or doctor in the world. The humble rich is a facade to stay in power.
Re:Katharine Graham: The Washington Post by nradov on Monday July 28, 2025 @02:40AM (#44707880)
There's no magic medication or doctor that can do much to compensate for a bad diet, including excess sugar. Plenty of wealthy people have died of type-2 diabetes. But one or maybe two Cokes per day isn't a problem for most people.
Re:Katharine Graham: The Washington Post by aspenmayer on Monday July 28, 2025 @02:11AM (#44707714)
Probably some modern interpretation of noblesse oblige. If a rising tide lifts all ships, great and small, then Buffett is the rain man. He’s probably the closest anyone came to making trickle down economics more than just a theory as an individual in business. He made a lot of folks very wealthy simply by making investing boring and easy through his focus on value investing.

I don’t know much about him, but I know Berkshire Hathaway. He didn’t even found it; he took it over by monetary force. He knew who worked their ass off and who just talked shit. He came across someone who wronged him in a business deal at Berkshire Hathaway before he ran it, and he literally drove the prior owners out of their own company over it. He says it was the biggest mistake he made, which leads me to believe he is generally a serious person, but he’s also principled. He’s a case study on overcoming yourself in order to make better decisions.

His business sense may not be as learnable, but I have tried to apply his lessons to my own life, and I didn’t have to pay anything for that.

Re:Katharine Graham: The Washington Post by specialist on Thursday July 31, 2025 @08:39AM (#44745044)
Best as I can tell, (wannabe) investor types celebrate his accumulation of wealth. I appreciated his public statements about tax policy, rising inequity, etc. Otherwise, I was ambivalent about Buffet.

Until I listened to Acquired's episodes.

https://www.acquired.fm/episodes/berkshire-hathaway-part-i

Buffet is a rentier. He does not create wealth; he merely transfers it.

His most successful strategy is to find tranches of underutilized capital, and buy a controlling interest. Which he then ladders up to buy yet more tranches. Most famously Geico.

It's fair to say that I'm far less impressed by this strategy than Acquired's hosts.

Rentier is distinct from the raider (aka private equity) play of buying controlling interest in a corporation, looting it, loading it up with debt, and then unloading the resulting dumpster fire.

So at least Buffet isn't actively destroying jobs and wealth. As far as I know.

Re:Katharine Graham: The Washington Post by Mistletoe on Monday July 28, 2025 @12:41AM (#44707279)
Can you add this info to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Buffett#Personal_life? I never knew that.