Re:The Big Oops: Anatomy of a Thirty-Five Year Mistake
by igouy on Thursday July 24, 2025 @11:54AM
(#44672232)
Multi-methods do seem like a missed opportunity:
Re:The Big Oops: Anatomy of a Thirty-Five Year Mistake
by pjmlp on Friday July 25, 2025 @01:02PM
(#44685440)
At least we have Julia and Clojure as more mainstream versions of them.
Still it isn't CLOS.
Re:The Big Oops: Anatomy of a Thirty-Five Year Mistake
by pjmlp on Thursday July 24, 2025 @09:40AM
(#44670578)
I guess Julia and Clojure are exotic.
Since when do OOP languages have to be single paradigm?
By then point of view, people should stop complaining about C++ OOP then.
Re:The Big Oops: Anatomy of a Thirty-Five Year Mistake
by virgilp on Friday July 25, 2025 @10:21AM
(#44683429)
> Since when do OOP languages have to be single paradigm?
What I really meant to say with that was that it's lisp at its core -i.e. if one wants to place it squarely in one single paradigm, imo that one should be "Functional".
I was just surprised to see it listed as an example of OOP language, because it's not the most representative one at that.
Re:The Big Oops: Anatomy of a Thirty-Five Year Mistake
by pjmlp on Friday July 25, 2025 @01:01PM
(#44685420)
The Art of Metaobject protocol was written and researched in Lisp.
Provides an OOP programming model, that no mainstream language, other than Common Lisp fully supports.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Art_of_the_Metaobject_Pr...
Dylan, Julia and Clojure only have subsets of it.
Re:The Big Oops: Anatomy of a Thirty-Five Year Mistake
by olvy0 on Friday July 25, 2025 @11:57AM
(#44684659)
C# does support a form of multiple dispatch, through the dynamic keyword. Used it myself for writing a parser.
https://shawnhargreaves.com/blog/visitor-and-multiple-dispat...
(also Common Lisp is hardly a poster child of OOP, at best you can say it's multi-paradigm like Scala)