News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Employee – CEO pay gap historically wide by gitremote on Wednesday July 23, 2025 @06:31PM (#44664716)
Why do you think this, other than "unions = communism"?
Re:Employee – CEO pay gap historically wide by bpt3 on Wednesday July 23, 2025 @07:48PM (#44665313)
I have no problem with unions as a concept and if people want to join them that's fine with me.

However, unions in practice enforce mediocrity while also becoming an institution that exists to support itself (aka its leaders) rather than its members once it reaches a large enough size (which is not unique to unions at all).

Unions makes no sense for a top performer in a field where an individual can outperform other workers performing similar tasks by orders of magnitude. Software development is one of those fields.

What part of that do you take issue with?

Re:Employee – CEO pay gap historically wide by Twistyfiasco on Thursday July 24, 2025 @10:17AM (#44671007)
A top performer is not immune to exploitation by capital.
Re:Employee – CEO pay gap historically wide by bpt3 on Thursday July 24, 2025 @11:13AM (#44671693)
Sure, no one is. However, a top performer is much less likely to be exploited and much more likely to have their pay reduced by collective bargaining.