Re:Greg Knauss's 10-year-old son's $23,800 bug bite
by eli on Sunday September 02, 2012 @12:40AM
(#4466181)
What makes you think anyone else would take on the liability of vetting your care for you? And for free?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Greg Knauss's 10-year-old son's $23,800 bug bite
by evolve2k on Sunday September 02, 2012 @01:09AM
(#4466229)
Because that's how it works in developed countries.
Re:Greg Knauss's 10-year-old son's $23,800 bug bite
by rdtsc on Sunday September 02, 2012 @02:53AM
(#4466419)
If a law was passed that they have to that's what. If a law was passed that any hospital billing mistake in favor of the hospital should be fined by a 10x fine of the amount on the first offence and a much higher one on subsequent offences. That kind of stuff, stuff that would protect individual citizens when they get sick and are most vulnerable. In a normal country that's what would happen.
Re:Greg Knauss's 10-year-old son's $23,800 bug bite
by eli on Sunday September 02, 2012 @09:16AM
(#4466936)
The hospital didn't make a mistake in this case; they were indeed covered under the plan. The specialist who is not under the plan is probably not an employee of the hospital. So basically you're saying we should overhaul the way medical billing works. I totally agree, but I don't think that is accomplished by passing a law that levies fines on hospitals.