Re:Don't bother parsing: Just use images for RAG
by imperfect_light on Tuesday July 22, 2025 @11:31PM
(#44655483)
My question is less about PDFs and more about the notion that all the facts needed for the RAG are in documents. In my experience just a fraction of the questions that might be useful exist in a document somewhere. There must be a variation of RAGs that are pulling not from documents, but from databases using some semantic model.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Don't bother parsing: Just use images for RAG
by petesergeant on Wednesday July 23, 2025 @03:59AM
(#44656784)
Sure, but the process for this is laughably easy: you render the text with a minimum amount of text to place it into context, and submit that to whatever your embedding-maker is to get the embedding. You could potentially store the embedding in the same DB row if you have a DB that's happy with vector searches.