Re:Staying cool without refrigerants: Next-generation Peltie...
by amelius on Monday July 21, 2025 @06:51AM
(#44633716)
Huh, control theorists always try to rigorously prove the stability and performance of their algorithms. AI seems to be the opposite of that: just let the black box solve it and don't worry about any problems, we'll just add more training data if they happen!
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Staying cool without refrigerants: Next-generation Peltie...
by FirmwareBurner on Monday July 21, 2025 @07:22AM
(#44633899)
Yes! Let's spend 100x the resources on AI to do what a PID controller or Kalman filter can do.
Re:Staying cool without refrigerants: Next-generation Peltie...
by ethbr1 on Monday July 21, 2025 @10:21AM
(#44635428)
I’m less scared about 100x the resources (in most applications) in exchange for decreasing programmer time / need.
What worries me far more is the lack of formalism around risk / boundary cases by undertrained teams using modern AI solutions.
Anyone building on top of a thing should either understand (a) how it’s built in detail or (b) its specifications and behavior in detail.
Most of these teams understand neither about LLMs.
Re:Staying cool without refrigerants: Next-generation Peltie...
by FirmwareBurner on Monday July 21, 2025 @10:27AM
(#44635500)
>Most of these teams understand neither about LLMs.
That's where my 100x comes from, not from the dev effort but from the debugging of issues of an unknown black box.