I'm betting against AI agents in 2025, despite building them

Re:I'm betting against AI agents in 2025, despite building them by sarchertech on Sunday July 20, 2025 @09:47PM (#44631069)

If you’re going by bugs per lines of code, I’m far higher than 99% reliable.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I'm betting against AI agents in 2025, despite building them by stavros on Monday July 21, 2025 @03:16AM (#44632551)

When measuring the reliability of my vacuum, I don't go by component, so I don't go by line when I measure the reliability of my code.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I'm betting against AI agents in 2025, despite building them by sarchertech on Tuesday July 22, 2025 @12:43PM (#44649681)

Ok if we measure uptime of the software I’ve written it’s far higher than 99%.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I'm betting against AI agents in 2025, despite building them by stavros on Tuesday July 22, 2025 @01:43PM (#44650609)

Again, we're not measuring uptime. We're measuring how many of them had at least one bug.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I'm betting against AI agents in 2025, despite building them by sarchertech on Tuesday July 22, 2025 @02:59PM (#44651547)

So if your vacuum had one component that was out of spec, but didn’t put it out of commission for any length of time, it’s 0% reliable?

[ Parent | on HN ]