Re:FFmpeg devs boast of another 100x leap thanks to handwrit...
by ethan_smith on Sunday July 20, 2025 @07:08PM
(#44630230)
It's definitely 100x (or 100.73x) as shown in the screenshot, which represents a 9973% speedup - the article text incorrectly uses percentage notation in some places.
Re:FFmpeg devs boast of another 100x leap thanks to handwrit...
by andersmurphy on Monday July 21, 2025 @03:27AM
(#44632610)
The article probably contains traces of blue.
Re:FFmpeg devs boast of another 100x leap thanks to handwrit...
by VladVladikoff on Monday July 21, 2025 @08:45AM
(#44634475)
What does this mean?
Re:FFmpeg devs boast of another 100x leap thanks to handwrit...
by MadnessASAP on Sunday July 20, 2025 @05:46PM
(#44629619)
100x to the single function 100% (2x) to the whole filter
Re:FFmpeg devs boast of another 100x leap thanks to handwrit...
by pizlonator on Sunday July 20, 2025 @05:33PM
(#44629498)
The ffmpeg folks are claiming 100x not 100%. Article probably has a typo
Re:FFmpeg devs boast of another 100x leap thanks to handwrit...
by k_roy on Sunday July 20, 2025 @08:20PM
(#44630658)
That would be quite the percentage difference with 100x
Re:FFmpeg devs boast of another 100x leap thanks to handwrit...
by torginus on Sunday July 20, 2025 @06:17PM
(#44629882)
I'd guess the function operates of 8 bit values judging from the name. If the previous implementation was scalar, a double-pumped AVX512 implementation can process 128 elements at a time, making the 100x speedup plausible.
Re:FFmpeg devs boast of another 100x leap thanks to handwrit...
by ErrorNoBrain on Sunday July 20, 2025 @06:31PM
(#44629984)
it doesnt matter
it's faster
thats what matters
100x would be a 9900% speed boost, while a 100% speed boost would mean it's 2x as fast.
Which one is it?