Re:Meta says it wont sign Europe AI agreement, calling it gr...
by rockemsockem on Saturday July 19, 2025 @03:32PM
(#44618562)
Are you saying that upon reading a sentence like
"Meta disagrees with European regulation"
That you don't have an immediate guess at which party you are most likely to agree with?
I do and I think most people do.
I'm not about to go around spreading my uninformed opinion though. What my comment said was that I was surprised at people's kneejerk reaction that Europe must be right, especially on HN. Perhaps I should have also chided those people for commenting at all, but that's hindsight for you.
Re:Meta says it wont sign Europe AI agreement, calling it gr...
by troupo on Sunday July 20, 2025 @12:11AM
(#44621898)
The "kneejerk reaction" is precisely because it's Meta. You know, the poor innocent trillion-dollar supranational corporation whose latest foray into AI was "opt-in all of our users into training our AI and make the opt-out an awkward broken multi-step process designed to discourage the opt-out".
Whereas EU's "heavy-handed and ill-conceived" regulations are "respect copyright, respect user choice, document your models, and use AI responsibly".
Re:Meta says it wont sign Europe AI agreement, calling it gr...
by rockemsockem on Monday July 21, 2025 @02:12PM
(#44638463)
This is literally an ad hominem.
Meta is capable of having correct actions and opinions and you are grossly oversimplifying the EU regulation.
And that's the problem: assuming by default.
How about not assuming by default? How about reading something about this? How about forming your own opinion, and not the opinion of the trillion- dollar supranational corporations?