Re:Anthropic tightens usage limits for Claude Code without t...
by brokencode on Friday July 18, 2025 @08:54AM
(#44604181)
Interestingly, devs felt that it sped them up even though it slowed them down in the study.
So even if it’s not an actual productivity booster on individual tasks, perhaps it still could reduce cognitive load and possibly burnout in the long term.
Either way, it’s a tool that devs should feel free to use or not use according to their preferences.
Re:Anthropic tightens usage limits for Claude Code without t...
by bjclark on Friday July 18, 2025 @11:41AM
(#44605982)
You should actually read the paper. N size of 16. Only 1 of which had used cursor more than 40 hours before. All people working in existing code bases where they were the primary author.
Re:Anthropic tightens usage limits for Claude Code without t...
by latexr on Saturday July 19, 2025 @05:14AM
(#44613849)
I did read the paper, and the HN discussion (which is how I found it). I recommend you read that, your comments were addressed.
Re:Anthropic tightens usage limits for Claude Code without t...
by adi_kurian on Wednesday July 30, 2025 @08:24PM
(#44741079)
Which of bjclark's specific points does the thread actually refute?
Recent research suggests it would in fact speed you up.
https://metr.org/blog/2025-07-10-early-2025-ai-experienced-o...