News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Don't Fall for AI: Reasons for Writers to Reject Slop. Parent comment

Re:Don't Fall for AI: Reasons for Writers to Reject Slop by bluefirebrand on Thursday July 17, 2025 @07:40PM (#44599560)
> like a lot of what we've seen with AI, lets see how you feel in two years time when the models have improved as much

People have been saying this for years now though

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Don't Fall for AI: Reasons for Writers to Reject Slop by JKCalhoun on Thursday July 17, 2025 @09:13PM (#44600160)
And I think every year they have improved? I can say I am certainly much more impressed now than I was a year ago.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Don't Fall for AI: Reasons for Writers to Reject Slop by bluefirebrand on Saturday July 19, 2025 @12:02AM (#44612485)
I have been testing them out in my day to day workflow every so often and I remain just as unimpressed as I was when I first tried copilot a year and a half or so ago

I don't think they are any better at coding than they were. I think people are lowering their standards to what LLMs can accomplish, not that LLMs have risen to meet our standards

[ Parent | on HN ]