News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Apple versus Samsung: Jury foreman justifies $1bn verdict. Parent comment

Re:Apple versus Samsung: Jury foreman justifies $1bn verdict by gurkendoktor on Friday August 31, 2012 @07:28AM (#4459182)
No, but the part about bribery is pure speculation. I am also shocked to find this at the top spot.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple versus Samsung: Jury foreman justifies $1bn verdict by scotty79 on Friday August 31, 2012 @08:03AM (#4459268)
So much money is in the play that bribery should be assumed by default until proven beyond reasonable dubt otherwise.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple versus Samsung: Jury foreman justifies $1bn verdict by greedo on Friday August 31, 2012 @09:15AM (#4459524)
And logically you could extend that to ridiculous extremes. Assuming anything by default is a sign of a weak argument.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple versus Samsung: Jury foreman justifies $1bn verdict by scotty79 on Friday August 31, 2012 @10:05AM (#4459736)
In my feeling assuming that there were no bribes in $1bn trial is already ridiculous extreme of rule: Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
[ Parent | on HN ]