I'm Switching to Python and Actually Liking It

Re:I'm Switching to Python and Actually Liking It by suspended_state on Wednesday July 16, 2025 @04:59PM (#44586718)

Well, after writing my comment, I realized that a python interpreter could define the variable and set it to None between the guarded block and the except block, and implicitly assign it to the raised exception right before evaluating the except block, when the exception as been raised. So technically, it would be possible to define the variable e in GP example and have it scoped to "whatever is after the guarded block", just like what is done with for blocks.

Is there any chance this would cause trouble though? Furthermore, what would be the need of having this variable accessible after the except block? In the case of a for block, it could be interesting to know at which point the for block was "passed".

So, maybe "None" answers your question?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I'm Switching to Python and Actually Liking It by NekkoDroid on Thursday July 17, 2025 @10:24AM (#44593797)

The answer is: it is unbound. Intellisense will most likely tell you it is `Unbound | <type>` when you try to use the value from a for loop. Would it be possible that it could be default initialized to `None`? Sure, but `None` is a destinctivly different value than a still unbound variable and may result in different handling.

[ Parent | on HN ]