News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Field Notes on Shipping with Claude Code by orwin on Tuesday July 15, 2025 @07:28AM (#44570042)
I think I could've written this post, maybe not as positively. I agree with almost everything (and I think I mostly agree with the 'test' part, but it depends which kind of test we're talking about). I know I don't add much on the discussion, but I want to point out that this is a very comprehensive post.
Re:Field Notes on Shipping with Claude Code by zihotki on Tuesday July 15, 2025 @07:00AM (#44569873)
I strongly disagree with statement that the tests should be written by human. Human is responsible for ensuring the correctness of implementation and signing off the task.

And I'd add one more item - use compiled language like java, c#, typescript, etc. Compiler is an additional validation point and helps rule out api method hallucinations.

Re:Field Notes on Shipping with Claude Code by Freedom2 on Tuesday July 15, 2025 @10:09AM (#44571344)
TypeScript isn't compiled though, it's transpiled back to JavaScript. I agree with the sense that it eliminates classes of errors, however.
Re:Field Notes on Shipping with Claude Code by 38 on Wednesday July 16, 2025 @08:01PM (#44588217)
Claude is absolute trash. I am on the paid plan and repeatedly hit the limits. and their support is essentially non existing, even for paid accounts
Re:Field Notes on Shipping with Claude Code by ishita159 on Thursday July 17, 2025 @12:31AM (#44589718)
Which plan are you on?

My entire team loves Claude Code. My cofounder actually shipped a small tool entirely on it.