Re:The Cooper Journal: The best interface is no interface
by rachelbythebay on Thursday August 30, 2012 @12:06PM
(#4455262)
Apparently the best page is blank without JavaScript enabled, too.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Cooper Journal: The best interface is no interface
by pattern on Thursday August 30, 2012 @02:14PM
(#4455938)
This isn't too far from the truth! I make extensive use of dotjs[1] to inject my own CSS rules into web sites that I use frequently. ~65% of what I do is simply hiding useless divs/ads/flash and removing background colors, with the other 35% being mostly typographic tweaks (`line-height` and `font-size` being popular candidates here).
Re:The Cooper Journal: The best interface is no interface
by sp332 on Thursday August 30, 2012 @02:36PM
(#4456072)
Interesting, it loaded just fine in the text-only "links" browser for me.
Re:The Cooper Journal: The best interface is no interface
by rachelbythebay on Thursday August 30, 2012 @04:26PM
(#4456587)
I found part of the problem:
#content { padding-top: 53px; z-index: 0; visibility: hidden; }
They're obviously flipping attributes around in scripting.
So, keeping with the theme of "no interface", disabling style sheets for this site will let the content display. Brilliant!
Re:The Cooper Journal: The best interface is no interface
by sp332 on Thursday August 30, 2012 @04:35PM
(#4456640)
That's an overly-aggressive approach to avoiding FOUC (flash of unstyled content).
Re:The Cooper Journal: The best interface is no interface
by dredmorbius on Thursday August 30, 2012 @01:40PM
(#4455777)
Was just going to say the same thing. Ironic irony is ironic.