Right back at you. If you think my comment is a non-sequitur, maybe you didn't read the article?

"Pretty convenient (cough cough) for a company that makes most of its revenue from ads to be removing that."

It's staring you and the author right in the face, but you missed it. It doesn't matter if you find a workaround, you're fighting a business model that hates your mental health.

I don’t know. Eventually you read enough of this stuff and you would rather the next breath be, take leadership on a real solution. To me it’s a “sequitur” to say, the biggest fuck you is to convince people to stop using Chrome, not to fix bugs for their extremely highly paid engineers for free.

Uh sir the article is about JavaScript Browser APIS

every day, people are writing about javascript browser apis, why do you think we're reading about this one?

It's a oui-sequitur for sure.