Re:What killed the Linux desktop
by hnriot on Wednesday August 29, 2012 @03:13PM
(#4450486)
by choice though, or out of work necessity?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I use Linux as a desktop OS out of choice. Originally, no - because I couldn't afford a MacBook, but I've learned to love it and I don't have any need to switch.
Linux desktop is an OS for people who are willing to invest time to get an utterly fantastic, fascinating experience. It doesn't suit modern instant-gratification culture, no, and yes, it takes experience and expertise to get the most out of it, but once you get there, it's bloody amazing.
I'd recommend having it as a small hobby as well as tool, so you can spend time learning and figuring things out and broadening your knowledge.
Disclaimer: Using Arch Linux with the i3 window manager. No, it's not for everyone, but I absolutely love it.
By choice here and have been using it for about 6 years now on the desktop and I have no plans of migrating anywhere else.
I have a Linux desktop at work and one at home. I actually see the modern Linux desktop as absolutely amazing compared to where it was a decade ago.
I also have a Mountain Lion MBP, but AFAICT, I will be leaving the Apple cart after it dies and I'll be 100% Linux.
Do you really think there are no people that use Linux by choice?
Choice here too - have been running Linux at home for almost 10 years and I never regretted it. There are almost no downsides, except careful choosing what hardware to buy and the lack of Photoshop (though Wine helps with that now).
Re:What killed the Linux desktop
by OriginalSyn on Wednesday August 29, 2012 @04:36PM
(#4450986)
I use Windows out of necessity at home to play my video games. I use Linux as choice as my IDE at work.
Both.
I need it for work, and I wouldn't have it any other way.
Re:What killed the Linux desktop
by brianobush on Wednesday August 29, 2012 @06:28PM
(#4451754)
actually both. home and work. my children's friends think I am a hacker since my console looks like a hacker's computer.