Re:Jack Dorsey Releases BitChat: Encrypted Messaging via Blu...
by johnisgood on Monday July 07, 2025 @11:39AM
(#44491484)
Monero should work for the public and pseudonymous bit, and next time pay attention before sending, all wallets ask for confirmation prior to sending.
Re:Jack Dorsey Releases BitChat: Encrypted Messaging via Blu...
by dylan604 on Monday July 07, 2025 @03:06PM
(#44493632)
> I lost ~$1,000 in a bad transfer because of a typo.
Was the option of doing a much smaller amount available to validate the account before following up with the full transfer? I've never understood not doing a test transfer first.
Re:Jack Dorsey Releases BitChat: Encrypted Messaging via Blu...
by MangoToupe on Monday July 07, 2025 @04:06PM
(#44494146)
You can still make a mistake after the test transfer.
Re:Jack Dorsey Releases BitChat: Encrypted Messaging via Blu...
by tshaddox on Monday July 07, 2025 @08:08PM
(#44495787)
Or you can mistakenly think the test transfer worked as intended.
Re:Jack Dorsey Releases BitChat: Encrypted Messaging via Blu...
by buzzerbetrayed on Monday July 07, 2025 @08:36PM
(#44495900)
Not to mention that the necessity of "do a test transfer" already shows how massively broken the process is
Re:Jack Dorsey Releases BitChat: Encrypted Messaging via Blu...
by akimbostrawman on Tuesday July 08, 2025 @03:31AM
(#44497885)
Or maybe that "broken" design is just the result of the actual goal of decentralized P2P...
Re:Jack Dorsey Releases BitChat: Encrypted Messaging via Blu...
by johnisgood on Monday July 07, 2025 @09:48PM
(#44496247)
Advice: next time pay attention before sending, all wallets ask for confirmation prior to sending, for what is it worth. Always double check, or triple check.
Re:Jack Dorsey Releases BitChat: Encrypted Messaging via Blu...
by pizzafeelsright on Tuesday July 08, 2025 @09:30AM
(#44499790)
and then what?
I just got sent real estate documents because the sender used my uncommon firstNameLastName@ gmail, but because they had a typo of the last name it landed in my inbox.
Re:Jack Dorsey Releases BitChat: Encrypted Messaging via Blu...
by johnisgood on Tuesday July 08, 2025 @12:22PM
(#44501504)
Are we talking about cryptocurrencies? Because they are not based on e-mail.
In fact, I have no idea how your comment is relevant to losing money.
You accidentally got someone else's document. How is that relevant to losing money?
As a reminder, you said: "I lost ~$1,000 in a bad transfer because of a typo.". How can you lose ~$1,000 because of someone else's typo in which an e-mail landed in your inbox?
Irreversible is bad because mistakes happen. I lost ~$1,000 in a bad transfer because of a typo.
Publicly verifiable -- not good because I don't want the public knowing what I buy.
Pseudonymous is the worst of both. Is it or is it not me? them?
I am thinking digital cash using pub keys on a network run from space on something like starlink sats.