I don't think AGI is right around the corner

Re:I don't think AGI is right around the corner by aydyn on Sunday July 06, 2025 @09:48PM (#44485939)

I think your definition is flawed.

Take the Artificial out of AGI. What is GI, and do the majority of humans have it? If so, then why is your definition of AGI far stricter than the definition of Human GI?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I don't think AGI is right around the corner by Buttons840 on Sunday July 06, 2025 @11:46PM (#44486571)

My definition is a high-bar that is undeniably AGI. My personal opinion is that there are some lower-bars that are also AGI. I actually think it's fair to call LLMs from GPT3 onward AGI.

But, when it comes to the lower-bars, we can spend a lot of time arguing over the definition of a single term, which isn't especially helpful.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I don't think AGI is right around the corner by aydyn on Monday July 07, 2025 @01:28AM (#44487045)

Okay, but then its not so much a definition. It's more like a test.

[ Parent | on HN ]