News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Jane Street barred from Indian markets as regulator freezes $566 million. Parent comment

Re:Jane Street barred from Indian markets as regulator freez... by pgwhalen on Sunday July 06, 2025 @09:38PM (#44485871)
The SEC has similar autonomy in regulating that you describe. Congress does not legislate the rules that the SEC holds firms to.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Jane Street barred from Indian markets as regulator freez... by mlrtime on Monday July 07, 2025 @07:33AM (#44489193)
Not entirely true, Operation Chokepoint 2.0.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Jane Street barred from Indian markets as regulator freez... by pgwhalen on Monday July 07, 2025 @03:48PM (#44493986)
I'm not sure how this is related. The so-called "Operation Choke Point 2.0" (which as far as I can tell is just a term used by the Trump administration to describe behavior of the Biden administration) is about bank regulation, which is not under the purview of the SEC.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Jane Street barred from Indian markets as regulator freez... by DrillShopper on Monday July 07, 2025 @02:17PM (#44493181)
They (presumably) do after Chevron deference was killed
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Jane Street barred from Indian markets as regulator freez... by pgwhalen on Monday July 07, 2025 @02:28PM (#44493284)
I don't think this exactly the takeaway of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. It just means judges have more power to weigh in with their own opinions when there is ambiguity involved, not that all the specifics of implementation _have_ to be specified to mean anything.
[ Parent | on HN ]